MSI X370 GAMING PLUS (MS-7A33)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics42.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive197% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7A33
MotherboardMSI X370 GAMING PLUS (MS-7A33)  (all builds)
Memory24.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180315
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 10 '19 at 04:39
Run Duration261 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Memory 74.5
1-Core 111
2-Core 221
75% 136 Pts
4-Core 442
8-Core 856
77% 649 Pts
64-Core 862
53% 862 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1268 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.9.2
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.3% Average
Lighting 50.3
Reflection 63.4
Parallax 64.4
41% 59.4 fps
MRender 62.5
Gravity 50
Splatting 53
45% 55.2 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2018)-$35
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 101110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1098 635 610 603 596 597 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
197% Outstanding
Read 1,886
Write 1,980
Mixed 1,625
SusWrite 690
347% 1,545 MB/s
4K Read 39
4K Write 88.4
4K Mixed 52.9
174% 60.1 MB/s
DQ Read 629
DQ Write 506
DQ Mixed 592
437% 576 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 197%
Great: 284%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
76GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 463 466 473 478 477 479 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 478
Mixed 455
SusWrite 473
107% 476 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 77.7
4K Mixed 48.5
158% 54.2 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 361
272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 114%
Great: 133%
WD Elements 25A3 8TB
2TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 164 162 162 160 159 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
71.4% Very good
Read 141
Write 148
Mixed 94.5
SusWrite 161
186% 136 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.2
218% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 96%
WDC WD75 00AARS-00Y5B1 750GB
393GB free, PID 9561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 88 87 87 89 86 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.4% Below average
Read 64
Write 61.8
Mixed 46
SusWrite 87
89% 64.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
68% 0.9 MB/s
WDC WD50 00BPKT-80PK4T0 500GB
200GB free, PID 9561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 88 86 86 88 86 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38.3% Below average
Read 86.5
Write 89.7
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 86.4
109% 80.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
108% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 42%
ST8000VN 0022-2EL112 8TB
2TB free, PID 9561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.6 0.1 0.2 0.2 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
40.2% Average
Read 171
Write 163
Mixed 87
SusWrite 0.3
129% 105 MB/s
4K Read 14.1
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 1.2
226% 6.4 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 88%
ST1000LM 024 HN-M101MBB 1TB
763GB free, PID 9561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.3 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
18.1% Very poor
Read 84.7
Write 55.7
Mixed 44.2
SusWrite 0.6
54% 46.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2400 C15 Series 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
MC Read 32.1
MC Write 29.3
MC Mixed 28.9
86% 30.1 GB/s
SC Read 20.8
SC Write 30.3
SC Mixed 25.8
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 91.5
44% 91.5 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X370 GAMING PLUS (MS-7A33) Builds (Compare 856 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI X370 GAMING PLUS (MS-7A33)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $415
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback