Asrock 970M Pro3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics81% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive87.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970M Pro3  (all builds)
Memory21 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160617
Uptime1 Days
Run DateDec 07 '16 at 01:37
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Memory 94.3
1-Core 78.5
2-Core 140
65% 104 Pts
4-Core 264
8-Core 479
45% 372 Pts
64-Core 477
30% 477 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 376.19
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81% Excellent
Lighting 102
Reflection 110
Parallax 106
83% 106 fps
MRender 92.3
Gravity 95.9
Splatting 94.9
77% 94.4 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 81%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor M6S 256GB-$166
177GB free
Firmware: 1.08 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Read 455
Write 400
Mixed 431
96% 429 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 63.2
4K Mixed 32.6
118% 41.2 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 170
DQ Mixed 71.9
85% 149 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 104%
Plextor M6 Pro 256GB-$110
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Read 480
Write 434
Mixed 421
99% 445 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 52.6
4K Mixed 29.6
109% 37 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 154
DQ Mixed 81.9
87% 145 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 111%
Plextor M6 Pro 128GB-$161
47GB free
Firmware: 1.05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Read 481
Write 313
Mixed 370
86% 388 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 63.4
4K Mixed 29.1
112% 39.8 MB/s
DQ Read 201
DQ Write 166
DQ Mixed 79.8
88% 149 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 103%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$27
804GB free
Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 161
Mixed 111
114% 153 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 1.75
4K Mixed 0.28
89% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 100%
Great: 112%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
302GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Read 119
Write 132
Mixed 97.4
87% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1.22
4K Write 2.54
4K Mixed 0.35
137% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR3-2400 CL11 4GB DDR3-2400 CL11 8GB DDR3-2400 CL11 4GB DDR3-2400 CL11 8GB 24GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
55.9% Above average
MC Read 23.5
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 20
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 15.1
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 59
68% 59 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970M Pro3 Builds (Compare 848 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970M Pro3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $217
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback