Asrock 970M Pro3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics86.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive88.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970M Pro3  (all builds)
Memory21 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160617
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 03 '16 at 09:12
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Memory 93.9
1-Core 78.4
2-Core 145
66% 106 Pts
4-Core 271
8-Core 483
45% 377 Pts
64-Core 482
30% 482 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 376.9
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 114
Parallax 97.2
90% 107 fps
MRender 96.3
Gravity 101
Splatting 101
82% 99.5 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor M6S 256GB-$166
177GB free
Firmware: 1.08 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Read 456
Write 401
Mixed 428
96% 428 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 66.1
4K Mixed 32.3
119% 42.1 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 73.4
86% 150 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 104%
Plextor M6 Pro 256GB-$110
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Read 484
Write 432
Mixed 461
102% 459 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 64.6
4K Mixed 29.3
114% 40.5 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 157
DQ Mixed 83.7
88% 146 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 111%
Plextor M6 Pro 128GB-$161
47GB free
Firmware: 1.05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
79.8% Very good
Read 480
Write 315
Mixed 372
86% 389 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 64.3
4K Mixed 26.4
110% 39.4 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 169
DQ Mixed 82.4
90% 151 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 103%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$27
804GB free
Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
99.3% Outstanding
Read 179
Write 168
Mixed 136
120% 161 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 1.75
4K Mixed 0.28
90% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 112%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
305GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Read 146
Write 122
Mixed 106
93% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.22
4K Mixed 0.31
96% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR3-2400 CL11 4GB DDR3-2400 CL11 8GB DDR3-2400 CL11 4GB DDR3-2400 CL11 8GB 24GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
51.3% Above average
MC Read 22
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 16.3
52% 18 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 13.8
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 60
67% 60 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970M Pro3 Builds (Compare 848 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970M Pro3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $217
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback