Asrock 970M Pro3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics86.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive86.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970M Pro3  (all builds)
Memory20.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160617
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 02 '16 at 00:44
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
68.5% Good
Memory 92
1-Core 72
2-Core 135
62% 99.5 Pts
4-Core 244
8-Core 433
41% 338 Pts
64-Core 428
26% 428 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 376.9
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Lighting 109
Reflection 113
Parallax 98.4
89% 107 fps
MRender 96.6
Gravity 101
Splatting 101
82% 99.4 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor M6S 256GB-$166
177GB free
Firmware: 1.08 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
86% Excellent
Read 451
Write 403
Mixed 437
96% 430 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 62.4
4K Mixed 32.5
115% 40.5 MB/s
DQ Read 191
DQ Write 163
DQ Mixed 70.3
82% 141 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 86%
Great: 104%
Plextor M6 Pro 256GB-$110
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
86.3% Excellent
Read 484
Write 429
Mixed 464
102% 459 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 55.3
4K Mixed 28.9
109% 37.4 MB/s
DQ Read 189
DQ Write 139
DQ Mixed 80
83% 136 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 111%
Plextor M6 Pro 128GB-$161
46GB free
Firmware: 1.05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Read 474
Write 312
Mixed 372
86% 386 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 37.2
4K Mixed 28.4
97% 30.8 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 158
DQ Mixed 82.1
87% 145 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 103%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$27
804GB free
Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 187
Write 163
Mixed 138
122% 163 MB/s
4K Read 0.69
4K Write 1.62
4K Mixed 0.27
89% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 100%
Great: 112%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
333GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Read 149
Write 130
Mixed 101
94% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.81
4K Write 2.21
4K Mixed 0.3
108% 1.11 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR3-2400 CL11 4GB DDR3-2400 CL11 8GB DDR3-2400 CL11 4GB DDR3-2400 CL11 8GB 24GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
52.1% Above average
MC Read 22.7
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 18.7
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 14
32% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 64.1
62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970M Pro3 Builds (Compare 848 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970M Pro3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $217
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback