Today's hottest deals

Asrock IMB-780

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive117% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock IMB-780  (all builds)
Memory27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140605
Uptime1 Days
Run DateDec 04 '19 at 17:35
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$75
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Memory 90.2
1-Core 115
2-Core 227
82% 144 Pts
4-Core 392
8-Core 583
61% 488 Pts
64-Core 583
36% 583 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
ASRock(1849 0412) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO mSATA 1TB
871GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT44B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 462 441 442 439 438 440 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 487
Write 486
Mixed 424
SusWrite 444
104% 460 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 55.7
170% 64.6 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 362
272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 117%
Great: 128%
Sabrent ASM1351 500GB
402GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 26 32 29 28 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Read 39
Write 22.8
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 29
22% 29 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
107% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown i-DIMM 1315 CT102464BD160B.M16 1324 i-DIMM 1315 CT102464BD160B.M16 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.8% Above average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 14.8
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 17.2
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 67
60% 67 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $238Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback