Dell XPS 8700

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics69.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive66.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemDell XPS 8700  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0KWVT8
Memory6.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180613
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateJul 28 '21 at 05:07
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-4770-$255
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Memory 90.8
1-Core 112
2-Core 194
79% 132 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 555
58% 456 Pts
64-Core 550
37% 550 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$230
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
69.9% Good
Lighting 93.2
Reflection 88.7
Parallax 77.6
75% 86.5 fps
MRender 66
Gravity 81.1
Splatting 72.2
64% 73.1 fps
Poor: 63%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 73%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO mSATA 1TB
199GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT42B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 258 225 207 239 204 240 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
66.7% Good
Read 442
Write 260
Mixed 267
SusWrite 229
67% 300 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 19.7
4K Mixed 24.8
83% 23.8 MB/s
DQ Read 357
DQ Write 60.2
DQ Mixed 168
134% 195 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 128%
Sandisk Extreme SSD 2TB
524GB free
Firmware: 1012
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 38 36 40 35 41 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
16.3% Very poor
Read 37.3
Write 39
Mixed 37.4
SusWrite 37.9
9% 37.9 MB/s
4K Read 11.4
4K Write 10.4
4K Mixed 10.7
36% 10.8 MB/s
DQ Read 27.1
DQ Write 25.3
DQ Mixed 18.1
16% 23.5 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 87%
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB
586GB free
Firmware: 401000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 344 306 313 359 297 358 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
72% Very good
Read 382
Write 397
Mixed 363
SusWrite 330
83% 368 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 14.6
4K Mixed 25.3
89% 24 MB/s
DQ Read 363
DQ Write 56.3
DQ Mixed 64.1
84% 161 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 72%
Great: 120%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$95
1TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 174 161 180 154 181 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
99.9% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 194
Mixed 96.9
SusWrite 171
117% 160 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1
204% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 111%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
6TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 77 71 67 75 57 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 113
Write 153
Mixed 65
SusWrite 64.3
72% 98.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.4
153% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 92%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 6TB
5TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 11 11 12 11 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
8.09% Terrible
Read 15.1
Write 27.5
Mixed 29.1
SusWrite 11.5
16% 20.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.1
117% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 8.09%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 Hynix HMT41GU6MFR8C-PB 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 Hynix HMT41GU6MFR8C-PB 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
57.6% Above average
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 16.4
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 19.5
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 66
61% 66 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical XPS 8700 Builds (Compare 8,191 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Dell XPS 8700

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $423
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
Intel Core i7-11700K $346Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback