Alienware Aurora-R4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics79.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive41.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAlienware Aurora-R4  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 07JNH0
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131126
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 04 '19 at 03:32
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K-$280
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Memory 93.2
1-Core 92.7
2-Core 183
73% 123 Pts
4-Core 353
8-Core 513
54% 433 Pts
64-Core 623
38% 623 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.48
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
79.8% Very good
Lighting 99.4
Reflection 108
Parallax 101
81% 103 fps
MRender 94.1
Gravity 92.5
Splatting 96.4
78% 94.3 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteonit LAT-256M2S 256GB
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PNDA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 218 222 224 209 194 MB/s
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.8% Average
Read 229
Write 226
Mixed 198
SusWrite 213
49% 217 MB/s
4K Read 13.2
4K Write 29.2
4K Mixed 15.4
55% 19.3 MB/s
DQ Read 70.4
DQ Write 45.2
DQ Mixed 48.5
39% 54.7 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 56%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$139
866GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 404 426 433 441 444 443 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 468
Mixed 446
SusWrite 432
103% 458 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 65.5
4K Mixed 42.8
138% 46.9 MB/s
DQ Read 336
DQ Write 275
DQ Mixed 312
232% 308 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 103%
Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
175GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 370 293 294 294 294 293 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Read 478
Write 460
Mixed 408
SusWrite 306
93% 413 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 65
4K Mixed 43
140% 47.2 MB/s
DQ Read 351
DQ Write 275
DQ Mixed 314
235% 313 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
515GB free
Firmware: JC4A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 114 114 115 117 116 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
63.1% Good
Read 104
Write 104
Mixed 63.3
SusWrite 115
71% 96.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
58.4% Above average
MC Read 22.7
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 19.2
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 12
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 61.7
65% 61.7 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aurora-R4 Builds (Compare 1,695 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

System: Alienware Aurora-R4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $271
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $23Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback