MSI Z370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B45)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics110% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive166% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B45
MotherboardMSI Z370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B45)  (all builds)
Memory7.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170901
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 02 '19 at 19:51
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 46%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$175
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
79.5% Very good
Memory 79.5
1-Core 116
2-Core 224
78% 140 Pts
4-Core 428
8-Core 681
68% 554 Pts
64-Core 951
59% 951 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.41
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
110% Outstanding
Lighting 146
Reflection 144
Parallax 138
119% 143 fps
MRender 161
Gravity 125
Splatting 90.9
99% 125 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 110%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 508 168 162 164 161 161 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
166% Outstanding
Read 1,575
Write 1,268
Mixed 498
SusWrite 220
197% 891 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 97.5
4K Mixed 38.6
154% 56.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,040
DQ Write 895
DQ Mixed 638
568% 857 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 166%
Great: 236%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 237GB
28GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 272 184 183 181 172 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
76% Very good
Read 405
Write 394
Mixed 321
SusWrite 223
75% 336 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 77.8
4K Mixed 28.6
103% 41.1 MB/s
DQ Read 319
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 268
216% 303 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 76%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
504GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 110 110 110 112 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
61.4% Good
Read 103
Write 106
Mixed 59.7
SusWrite 111
70% 94.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 68%
Samsung HD502IJ 500GB-$40
311GB free
Firmware: 1AA01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 87 87 87 87 87 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
47.6% Average
Read 79
Write 87
Mixed 54.7
SusWrite 86.6
56% 76.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 59%
WDC WD10 EACS-22D6B1 1TB
467GB free, PID 2336
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.3 5.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
8.03% Terrible
Read 36
Write 5
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 5.2
14% 13.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
36% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.03%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
54.8% Above average
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 18.3
57% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 12.9
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 81.5
49% 81.5 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 128%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B45) Builds (Compare 3,984 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI Z370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B45) - $206

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $999
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback