Gigabyte GA-H170-D3H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive54.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte H170-D3H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H170-D3H-CF  (all builds)
Memory26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180309
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 02 '19 at 13:18
Run Duration213 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 59%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$247
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Memory 82
1-Core 122
2-Core 240
82% 148 Pts
4-Core 406
8-Core 590
62% 498 Pts
64-Core 652
40% 652 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.41
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Lighting 143
Reflection 135
Parallax 157
117% 145 fps
MRender 181
Gravity 135
Splatting 113
114% 143 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 113%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 156 128 59 99 86 MB/s
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
54.7% Above average
Read 142
Write 201
Mixed 266
SusWrite 126
42% 184 MB/s
4K Read 16.1
4K Write 68.1
4K Mixed 28.9
98% 37.7 MB/s
DQ Read 228
DQ Write 262
DQ Mixed 110
120% 200 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 88%
Samsun 840 EVO 120G 120GB
112GB free
Firmware: EXT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 143 144 144 144 143 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Read 441
Write 334
Mixed 360
SusWrite 170
73% 326 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 75.9
4K Mixed 36.9
133% 47.7 MB/s
DQ Read 348
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 180
181% 291 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 100%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
168GB free
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 588 309 311 303 306 303 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
162% Outstanding
Read 1,467
Write 992
Mixed 479
SusWrite 353
182% 823 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 37
155% 62.3 MB/s
DQ Read 515
DQ Write 1,069
DQ Mixed 346
390% 643 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 162%
Great: 236%
Samsun 840 PRO Seri 512GB
88GB free
Firmware: DXM0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 313 320 314 329 210 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
78.9% Very good
Read 419
Write 287
Mixed 345
SusWrite 301
76% 338 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 70.1
4K Mixed 30.4
106% 40.1 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 129
130% 204 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 123%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
447GB free
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 207 217 206 223 202 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
55.1% Above average
Read 305
Write 261
Mixed 248
SusWrite 223
58% 259 MB/s
4K Read 15.9
4K Write 53.1
4K Mixed 15.8
72% 28.3 MB/s
DQ Read 82.7
DQ Write 258
DQ Mixed 99.4
97% 147 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 102%
WD WD6401AALS-00L3B 640GB
561GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 75 75 75 76 75 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
47.8% Average
Read 90.8
Write 82.5
Mixed 54.8
SusWrite 75.6
56% 75.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 63%
WD WD2500AAKS-00VSA 250GB
224GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 44 44 44 44 43 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
23.4% Poor
Read 37.5
Write 39.3
Mixed 28.5
SusWrite 43.7
28% 37.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
111% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 4x8GB-$165
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
70.5% Very good
MC Read 25.5
MC Write 26.6
MC Mixed 23.7
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 21.4
58% 20.4 GB/s
Latency 76.9
52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H170-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 381 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H170-D3H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $439
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback