Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 28% Raft	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	5.15% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 M 520-$70 23,644 User benchmarks, average bench 40% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	29.5% Poor	Memory 53.1 1-Core 9.1 2-Core 37.7 24% 33.3 Pts	4-Core 35.4 8-Core 48 5% 41.7 Pts	64-Core 81.6 5% 81.6 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 29.5% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) 99,513 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(1071 A038) 3.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2993 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.64% Terrible	Lighting 0.67 Reflection 1.27 Parallax 0.66 0% 0.86 fps	MRender 1.1 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 1.3 1% 0.97 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.64% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 150 960GB-$190 3,375 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 403GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFZ12.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 34 53 54 56 58 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	5.15% Terrible	Read 35 Write 33.5 Mixed 21.4 SusWrite 46.4 8% 34.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.6 3% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 5.15% Great: 103%
Intel 750 Series NVMe PCIe 1.2TB-$1,000 994 User benchmarks, average bench 202% 367GB free Firmware: 01H0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 100 120 132 124 127 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	23% Poor	Read 60.1 Write 65.8 Mixed 64.6 SusWrite 115 17% 76.4 MB/s	4K Read 4.8 4K Write 11.2 4K Mixed 6.2 21% 7.4 MB/s	DQ Read 165 DQ Write 152 DQ Mixed 175 127% 164 MB/s
Poor: 124% ↑ This bench: 23% Great: 250%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Asint SSAC02G08-GDJNG 2x4GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1334 MHz Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	18.6% Very poor	MC Read 6.4 MC Write 5.8 MC Mixed 8.3 20% 6.83 GB/s	SC Read 2.4 SC Write 1.9 SC Mixed 3.3 7% 2.53 GB/s	Latency 150 27% 150 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 18.6% Great: 50%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM