ADD TO PC
BUILD

Getac B300G4

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	61% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Getac B300G4 (all builds)
Motherboard	GETAC B300G4
Memory	4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130422
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Mar 20 '19 at 23:47
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3320M-$199 30,496 User benchmarks, average bench 48% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	58.1% Above average	Memory 79.7 1-Core 71.7 2-Core 152 60% 101 Pts	4-Core 213 8-Core 212 28% 212 Pts	64-Core 214 13% 214 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 58.1% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Device(1071 B304) 2.2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4885 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	3.98% Terrible	Lighting 4.43 Reflection 5.85 Parallax 3.03 4% 4.44 fps	MRender 5.33 Gravity 2.47 Splatting 8.39 5% 5.4 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.98% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteonit LAT-128M3S 128GB 30 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 63GB free (System drive) Firmware: VA61 SusWrite @10s intervals: 314 316 289 313 309 292 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	61% Good	Read 391 Write 301 Mixed 231 SusWrite 306 69% 307 MB/s	4K Read 12.2 4K Write 25.1 4K Mixed 12.6 48% 16.6 MB/s	DQ Read 288 DQ Write 258 DQ Mixed 185 163% 244 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 61% Great: 87%
Liteonit LAT-128M3S 128GB 30 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 35GB free Firmware: VA61 SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 223 229 216 196 201 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	43.2% Average	Read 211 Write 195 Mixed 167 SusWrite 216 44% 197 MB/s	4K Read 11.7 4K Write 21.8 4K Mixed 12.2 45% 15.2 MB/s	DQ Read 185 DQ Write 170 DQ Mixed 136 113% 163 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 43.2% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Asint SSAC02G08-GDJNG 2x4GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	50.1% Above average	MC Read 18 MC Write 18.3 MC Mixed 16.2 50% 17.5 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 13.1 SC Mixed 16 42% 14.7 GB/s	Latency 81 49% 81 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 50.1% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback