Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics87.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive281% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 9  (all builds)
Memory17.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 27 '19 at 13:18
Run Duration215 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7820X-$375
CPU0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
89% Excellent
Memory 82.1
1-Core 140
2-Core 277
90% 166 Pts
4-Core 514
8-Core 957
88% 735 Pts
64-Core 1,411
87% 1,411 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 89%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
MSI(1462 336C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2113 MHz, MLim: 2652 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.20
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
87.6% Excellent
Lighting 100
Reflection 114
Parallax 97.4
82% 104 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 135
Splatting 114
99% 121 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
332GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1592 1506 1503 1490 1469 1464 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
281% Outstanding
Read 1,894
Write 1,552
Mixed 772
SusWrite 1504
320% 1,431 MB/s
4K Read 41.5
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 54.1
198% 73.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,289
DQ Write 1,076
DQ Mixed 1,061
828% 1,142 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 281%
Great: 353%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$70
125GB free
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 809 101 142 108 102 106 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
175% Outstanding
Read 1393
Write 1,461
Mixed 1,027
SusWrite 228
230% 1,027 MB/s
4K Read 47.9
4K Write 144
4K Mixed 65.2
232% 85.7 MB/s
DQ Read 638
DQ Write 892
DQ Mixed 271
343% 600 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 175%
Great: 255%
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60
118GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 72 72 71 71 72 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
39.4% Below average
Read 65.3
Write 69.5
Mixed 52
SusWrite 71.6
48% 64.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 58%
Seagate ST32000641AS 2TB-$159
542GB free
Firmware: CC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 82 83 83 83 84 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 113
Write 110
Mixed 66.8
SusWrite 82.9
68% 93 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
178% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64.2% Good
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 31
MC Mixed 19.1
68% 23.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 11.3
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 76.8
52% 76.8 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 164%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 9 Builds (Compare 217 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 110%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 9 - $500

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $1,517
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback