Asrock X399 Phantom Gaming 6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 115%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 137%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics145% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock X399 Phantom Gaming 6  (all builds)
Memory50.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181115
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 27 '19 at 11:22
Run Duration324 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 2920X
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Memory 63.1
1-Core 123
2-Core 246
77% 144 Pts
4-Core 490
8-Core 980
87% 735 Pts
64-Core 1,976
122% 1,976 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Nvidia(10DE 12A4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 432.0
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
145% Outstanding
Lighting 195
Reflection 217
Parallax 213
159% 208 fps
MRender 248
Gravity 204
Splatting 131
152% 194 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 145%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
820GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3877
Write 43.8
Mixed 80.7
277% 1,334 MB/s
4K Read 373
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 5.6
574% 127 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
232GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 391 250 251 250 250 249 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 479
Mixed 391
SusWrite 274
92% 411 MB/s
4K Read 41.4
4K Write 91.8
4K Mixed 51.8
178% 61.7 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 229
209% 318 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 108%
Great: 118%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
464GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,400
Write 1,914
Mixed 1860
458% 2,058 MB/s
4K Read 62
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 83.7
269% 91.2 MB/s
DQ Read 956
DQ Write 768
DQ Mixed 902
664% 875 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 355%
WD WD10JPCX-24UE4T0 1TB
929GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 99.5
Write 107
Mixed 57.5
65% 88.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 20% Great: 61%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 46.3
Write 41
Mixed 15.3
25% 34.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
168% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 101%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31
565GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 177
Write 153
Mixed 99.8
106% 143 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
241% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31
23GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 165
Write 134
Mixed 91.5
97% 130 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
218% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87
7.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 180 185 186 182 180 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 39% Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87
6TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 9.3 13 9.1 12 15 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Write 10.5
Mixed 3.5
SusWrite 10.5
6% 8.17 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0
2% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 90%
Asmt ASM1156-PM 1TB
605GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 87 85 90 89 97 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 111
Write 112
Mixed 72
SusWrite 89.2
71% 96 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1.1
189% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 101%
Asmt ASM1156-PM 1TB
378GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 87 86 90 89 98 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Read 103
Write 123
Mixed 57.5
SusWrite 89.2
68% 93.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 101%
Seagate FA GoFlex Pro 500GB
261GB free, PID 5161
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 38.2
Write 37.3
Mixed 29
44% 34.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
74% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 18%
Seagate FA GoFlex Desk 3TB
432GB free, PID 50a1
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 151 150 151 149 153 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
61.1% Good
Read 146
Write 141
Mixed 86.2
SusWrite 151
176% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
116% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 61%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 123GB
26GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 146
Write 78.2
Mixed 80.8
117% 102 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 3
191% 3.57 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB-$139
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
124% Outstanding
MC Read 49.7
MC Write 49.5
MC Mixed 48.5
141% 49.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 30.1
SC Mixed 22
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 124%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X399 Phantom Gaming 6 Builds (Compare 229 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock X399 Phantom Gaming 6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $1,151
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback