MSI H110M PRO-VH PLUS (MS-7A15)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics32.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive14.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7A15
MotherboardMSI H110M PRO-VH PLUS (MS-7A15)  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20170421
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 26 '19 at 16:50
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 20%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4600-$27
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Memory 90.9
1-Core 112
2-Core 199
78% 134 Pts
4-Core 314
8-Core 303
42% 309 Pts
64-Core 296
18% 296 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 385.69
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
32.4% Below average
Lighting 40.4
Reflection 31.7
Parallax 38.9
33% 37 fps
MRender 39.7
Gravity 38.2
Splatting 37.3
31% 38.4 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CGM Virtual Disk 0001 64GB
29GB free (System drive)
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 4.6 3.8 5.7 4.7 3.8 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Read 95.3
Write 3
Mixed 6.8
SusWrite 4.6
6% 27.4 MB/s
4K Read 7.9
4K Write 11.9
4K Mixed 10.9
32% 10.2 MB/s
DQ Read 11.2
DQ Write 0.2
DQ Mixed 0.4
2% 3.93 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 38%
CGM Virtual Disk 40726 1TB
137GB free
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 3.6 3.3 3.3 3 2.8 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.1% Very poor
Read 105
Write 3.3
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 3.6
6% 29.3 MB/s
4K Read 6.6
4K Write 11
4K Mixed 10.6
29% 9.4 MB/s
DQ Read 11.3
DQ Write 0.2
DQ Mixed 0.3
2% 3.93 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 14%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
41.8% Average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 11.3
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 13
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 65.9
61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M PRO-VH PLUS (MS-7A15) Builds (Compare 2,771 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI H110M PRO-VH PLUS (MS-7A15)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $157
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback