HP Compaq Pro 6300 MT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics32.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Compaq Pro 6300 MT  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 339A
Memory9.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130716
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 26 '19 at 16:09
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3470 CPU @ 3.20GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74% Very good
Memory 83.5
1-Core 99.2
2-Core 196
72% 126 Pts
4-Core 374
8-Core 369
50% 372 Pts
64-Core 374
23% 374 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 74%
Great: 71%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
32.5% Below average
Lighting 40.7
Reflection 32
Parallax 38.4
33% 37.1 fps
MRender 38.4
Gravity 38.8
Splatting 37
31% 38 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 33%
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
HP(103C 339A) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.75% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 2.81
Parallax 1.38
2% 1.99 fps
MRender 3.62
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 3.52
2% 2.75 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.75%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP S600 120GB
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HC0810H1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 83 32 62 62 56 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 363
Write 310
Mixed 286
SusWrite 70.3
58% 257 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 41.8
4K Mixed 15.4
79% 27.3 MB/s
DQ Read 87.7
DQ Write 135
DQ Mixed 26.4
44% 83.2 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 79%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
428GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 126 127 124 124 125 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Read 125
Write 123
Mixed 73.2
SusWrite 126
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 69%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
194GB free
Firmware: KC66
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 111 113 114 110 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
62.7% Good
Read 107
Write 101
Mixed 62.6
SusWrite 112
70% 95.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
137% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 88%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 250GB
108GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 16 15 15 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Read 28.3
Write 18.3
Mixed 15.7
SusWrite 16.1
25% 19.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1.5
125% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT325U6EFR8C-PB Kingston HP698650-154-KEB HMT325U6EFR8C-PB Kingston HP698650-154-KEB 12GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
54.8% Above average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 20.4
MC Mixed 16.6
54% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 17.7
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 74.4
54% 74.4 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Pro 6300 MT Builds (Compare 1,927 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Pro 6300 MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback