MSI A55M-P35 (MS-7697)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics7.01% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive21.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (70%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7697
MotherboardMSI A55M-P35 (MS-7697)  (all builds)
Memory6.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110927
Uptime4.6 Days
Run DateNov 23 '19 at 04:57
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 70%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 631
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
21.9% Poor
Memory 20.4
1-Core 34.7
2-Core 64.7
22% 39.9 Pts
4-Core 136
8-Core 124
18% 130 Pts
64-Core 136
8% 136 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Asus(1043 8439) 1GB
CLim: 1071 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 441.20
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
7.01% Terrible
Lighting 7.9
Reflection 7.54
Parallax 9.12
6% 8.19 fps
MRender 10.9
Gravity 8.07
Splatting 10.6
8% 9.85 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.01%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 46 25 33 58 79 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
21.5% Poor
Read 174
Write 83.9
Mixed 79.8
SusWrite 59.6
22% 99.3 MB/s
4K Read 9.4
4K Write 15.4
4K Mixed 8.5
33% 11.1 MB/s
DQ Read 15.7
DQ Write 16.5
DQ Mixed 14.8
12% 15.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$25
103GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 79 78 80 81 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 98.7
Write 99
Mixed 61.5
SusWrite 79.5
62% 84.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Team-Elite-1333 12GB
1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
22.5% Poor
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 8.4
MC Mixed 7.5
24% 8.5 GB/s
SC Read 4.9
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 5.7
14% 5.07 GB/s
Latency 317
13% 317 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A55M-P35 (MS-7697) Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI A55M-P35 (MS-7697)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback