TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Monster TULPAR T7 V19.5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics99.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive229% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMonster TULPAR T7 V19.5  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER TULPAR T7 V19.5
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190712
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 12 '19 at 18:53
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Memory 89
1-Core 136
2-Core 246
88% 157 Pts
4-Core 440
8-Core 858
77% 649 Pts
64-Core 1,056
65% 1,056 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑
This bench: 85.5%
 Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070 (Mobile)
Device(1D05 105D) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4112
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
99.9% Outstanding
Lighting 123
Reflection 124
Parallax 118
100% 122 fps
MRender 163
Gravity 110
Splatting 100
99% 124 fps
Poor: 58% ↑
This bench: 99.9%
 Great: 99%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLB256 256GB
171GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXD7201Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 623 332 335 331 330 330 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
229% Outstanding
Read 2,180
Write 1,594
Mixed 1,196
SusWrite 380
297% 1,337 MB/s
4K Read 49.4
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 75
233% 80.7 MB/s
DQ Read 981
DQ Write 1,069
DQ Mixed 1,041
779% 1,030 MB/s
Poor: 123% ↑
This bench: 229%
 Great: 262%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
626GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 164 169 168 167 168 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
79% Very good
Read 111
Write 146
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 165
89% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑
This bench: 79%
 Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
81.1% Excellent
MC Read 32
MC Write 30.9
MC Mixed 22.6
81% 28.5 GB/s
SC Read 19.6
SC Write 32.1
SC Mixed 27
75% 26.2 GB/s
Latency 68.4
58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 29% ↑
This bench: 81.1%
 Great: 97%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical TULPAR T7 V19.5 Builds (Compare 175 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat

System: Monster TULPAR T7 V19.5

CPU
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples175x
GPU
RTX 2070 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 88%, 23,316 samples104x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples71x
SSD
MZVLB256HAHQ-00000 256GBSamsungBench 190%, 13,215 samples24x
XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBAdata  $59Bench 213%, 34,063 samples20x
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples15x
RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples52x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples36x
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 44%, 44,819 samples16x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback