Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results


Gaming 111% UFO	Desktop 101% UFO	Workstation 123% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	114% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	205% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER (all builds)
Memory	59.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190917
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 10 '19 at 20:16
Run Duration	336 Seconds
Run User	CHL-User
Background CPU	58%

Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375 197,342 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	93.2% Outstanding	Memory 85.9 1-Core 151 2-Core 295 96% 177 Pts	4-Core 537 8-Core 1,118 97% 827 Pts	64-Core 1,964 122% 1,964 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 93.2% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270 316,424 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 865F) CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.30 Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	114% Outstanding	Lighting 149 Reflection 159 Parallax 172 122% 160 fps	MRender 173 Gravity 139 Splatting 105 110% 139 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 134%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Amd-raid CT1000P 1TB 149 User benchmarks, average bench 155% 526GB free (System drive) Firmware: P3CR SusWrite @10s intervals: 1354 1430 1435 1465 1466 1469 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	205% Outstanding	Read 1,297 Write 1,281 Mixed 1,106 SusWrite 1,436 289% 1,280 MB/s	4K Read 35.3 4K Write 152 4K Mixed 51.8 200% 79.7 MB/s	DQ Read 32.5 DQ Write 124 DQ Mixed 49.1 46% 68.6 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 205% Great: 225%
Amd-raid CT1000P 1TB 149 User benchmarks, average bench 155% 412GB free Firmware: P3CR SusWrite @10s intervals: 892 1121 1459 1456 1460 1085 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	170% Outstanding	Read 872 Write 1,443 Mixed 953 SusWrite 1,245 256% 1,128 MB/s	4K Read 33.8 4K Write 128 4K Mixed 49.3 182% 70.4 MB/s	DQ Read 33.2 DQ Write 116 DQ Mixed 141 89% 96.5 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 170% Great: 225%
Amd-raid WDC WDS500G1B0A- 500GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 355GB free Firmware: X411 SusWrite @10s intervals: 310 292 288 290 292 292 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	45.8% Average	Read 293 Write 362 Mixed 255 SusWrite 294 68% 301 MB/s	4K Read 10.2 4K Write 18.2 4K Mixed 12.7 41% 13.7 MB/s	DQ Read 44.1 DQ Write 99.7 DQ Mixed 10.1 25% 51.3 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 45.8% Great: 72%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 411GB free Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1180 1413 614 616 619 620 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	283% Outstanding	Read 2,576 Write 2,375 Mixed 1,540 SusWrite 844 409% 1,834 MB/s	4K Read 67.3 4K Write 165 4K Mixed 91.4 306% 108 MB/s	DQ Read 337 DQ Write 1,146 DQ Mixed 1,178 776% 887 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 283% Great: 340%
Amd-raid Samsung SSD 850 500GB 232 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 466GB free Firmware: EMT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 403 413 412 421 420 420 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	81.3% Excellent	Read 438 Write 397 Mixed 339 SusWrite 415 89% 397 MB/s	4K Read 28.9 4K Write 53.7 4K Mixed 35.3 118% 39.3 MB/s	DQ Read 25.6 DQ Write 50.2 DQ Mixed 32.2 26% 36 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 81.3% Great: 99%
Amd-raid WDC WD20EZRX-19D 2TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 86GB free Firmware: 81.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 89 88 90 89 90 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	47% Average	Read 74.7 Write 77.5 Mixed 39.7 SusWrite 88.8 51% 70.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 47% Great: 47%
Amd-raid WDC WD30EZRX-00D 3TB 45 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 686GB free Firmware: 80.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 86 86 88 88 89 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	53.3% Above average	Read 99 Write 102 Mixed 46 SusWrite 86.3 61% 83.3 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 197% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 53.3% Great: 81%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C19 4x16GB 965 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	125% Outstanding	MC Read 51.1 MC Write 45.1 MC Mixed 44.6 134% 46.9 GB/s	SC Read 26.1 SC Write 26.9 SC Mixed 39.1 88% 30.7 GB/s	Latency 71.3 56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 125% Great: 134%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X570 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 5,053 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 184%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 201%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER - $479

CPU
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $260Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	1,170x
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD $375Bench 88%, 197,342 samples	871x
Ryzen 9 5950XAMD $369Bench 100%, 33,026 samples	870x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $700Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	611x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $615Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	530x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,198Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	489x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $105Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	483x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $100Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	314x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $160Bench 416%, 138,083 samples	216x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	291x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x16GBG.SKILLBench 110%, 12,538 samples	159x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 106%, 11,505 samples	94x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Very good

Total price: $1,544

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16