ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus GL553VD

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	7.01% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	62.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Asus GL553VD (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK GL553VD
Memory	4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180102
Uptime	14.5 Days
Run Date	Nov 08 '19 at 03:08
Run Duration	111 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	74.7% Very good	Memory 83.4 1-Core 112 2-Core 216 78% 137 Pts	4-Core 362 8-Core 484 54% 422 Pts	64-Core 484 30% 484 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 74.7% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 15E0) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4599 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	7.01% Terrible	Lighting 7.57 Reflection 25.2 Parallax 7.28 6% 13.3 fps	MRender 7.57 Gravity 6.53 Splatting 15.5 9% 9.86 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 7.01% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GB 39,780 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 135GB free (System drive) Firmware: 30200P10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 248 251 251 258 258 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	62.1% Good	Read 348 Write 255 Mixed 205 SusWrite 250 59% 264 MB/s	4K Read 10.5 4K Write 61.5 4K Mixed 11.9 64% 28 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 258 DQ Mixed 185 174% 275 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 83%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GB 144,145 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	41.7% Average	MC Read 16.1 MC Write 14 MC Mixed 11.1 39% 13.7 GB/s	SC Read 12.6 SC Write 15.2 SC Mixed 14.3 40% 14 GB/s	Latency 74.5 54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 41.7% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical GL553VD Builds (Compare 3,981 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Asus GL553VD

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	2,838x
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples	1,141x
Core i7-7820HQIntelBench 63%, 15,851 samples	1x

GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	2,447x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	1,528x
GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 29%, 105,856 samples	4x

SSD
SD8SN8U128G1002 128GBSandiskBench 65%, 7,802 samples	274x
SD8SNAT128G1002 128GBSandiskBench 56%, 12,768 samples	249x
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GBBench 70%, 39,780 samples	203x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	664x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	312x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	186x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.

Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?

PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.

Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.

Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?

Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.

Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?

Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback