Asus GL553VD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics4.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus GL553VD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL553VD
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180102
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 25 '19 at 21:35
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 53.3
2-Core 118
38% 85.8 Pts
4-Core 242
8-Core 475
42% 359 Pts
64-Core 505
31% 505 Pts
Poor: 38% Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 15E0) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4599
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
4.49% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 22.8
Parallax 2.47
5% 10.4 fps
MRender 1.43
Gravity 5.5
Splatting 6.39
4% 4.44 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.49%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30200P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 165 148 83 70 80 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.8% Below average
Read 254
Write 234
Mixed 100
SusWrite 128
40% 179 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 26.2
4K Mixed 14.3
41% 15.5 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 179
DQ Mixed 156
122% 166 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 83%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
7GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.7 2.5 3.1 2.8 2.9 3.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
5.93% Terrible
Read 24.8
Write 3
Mixed 7
SusWrite 2.8
9% 9.4 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 1.1
59% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.93%
Great: 13%
Samsung Flash Drive 64GB
27GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.7 11 26 31 33 32 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
25.7% Poor
Read 110
Write 47.7
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 22.7
49% 46.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
75% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
26.1% Poor
MC Read 12.6
MC Write 10.8
MC Mixed 9.1
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 1.6
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 2.4
8% 2.97 GB/s
Latency 985
4% 985 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GL553VD Builds (Compare 3,987 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus GL553VD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback