Asus CG8250

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics51.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus CG8250  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK CG8250
Memory2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120313
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateNov 07 '19 at 23:26
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2300
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
60.7% Good
Memory 75.7
1-Core 76.2
2-Core 152
60% 101 Pts
4-Core 269
8-Core 250
35% 259 Pts
64-Core 268
17% 268 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.12
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Lighting 65.5
Reflection 65.9
Parallax 59.5
53% 63.6 fps
MRender 68.7
Gravity 61.1
Splatting 53.2
49% 61 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 118 129 113 137 121 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 237
Write 205
Mixed 212
SusWrite 124
44% 194 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 55
4K Mixed 27.5
93% 33.8 MB/s
DQ Read 30
DQ Write 105
DQ Mixed 39.4
38% 58.3 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 85%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$45
856GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 172 184 184 184 184 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 171
Write 151
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 180
94% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
147% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 101%
Great: 107%
Generic- USB3.0 CRW 64GB
51GB free, PID 0329
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 68 75 76 77 77 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 90.7
Write 78.7
Mixed 61.5
SusWrite 71.8
100% 75.7 MB/s
4K Read 6.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 3.4
229% 4.23 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 43%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 4TB
456GB free, PID ab34
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 81 86 88 89 90 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
38.2% Below average
Read 104
Write 77.7
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 82.5
110% 84.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 67%
G-DRIVE USB 10TB
8.5TB free, PID 8034
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 77 85 85 88 87 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 172
Write 172
Mixed 110
SusWrite 81.5
174% 134 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 1.3
233% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
44.1% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 13.5
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 13.6
38% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 88.8
45% 88.8 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CG8250 Builds (Compare 135 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus CG8250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $527
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback