Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	61.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$180 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	71.6% Very good	Memory 86.1 1-Core 95.8 2-Core 184 71% 122 Pts	4-Core 309 8-Core 512 50% 410 Pts	64-Core 591 37% 591 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 71.6% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 720 15,510 User benchmarks, average bench 4% MSI(1462 3381) 1GB CLim: 797 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 441.12 Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	3.51% Terrible	Lighting 4.13 Reflection 3.73 Parallax 4.22 3% 4.03 fps	MRender 5.29 Gravity 3.23 Splatting 5.17 4% 4.56 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.51% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D 500GB-$67 43,442 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 85GB free (System drive) Firmware: X61190WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 291 201 188 160 187 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	61.2% Good	Read 345 Write 393 Mixed 288 SusWrite 222 70% 312 MB/s	4K Read 22.3 4K Write 37.9 4K Mixed 26.2 88% 28.8 MB/s	DQ Read 22.9 DQ Write 273 DQ Mixed 243 160% 180 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 61.2% Great: 117%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$32 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 930GB free Firmware: CC62 SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 200 194 196 198 197 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	114% Outstanding	Read 200 Write 190 Mixed 77.2 SusWrite 197 121% 166 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 156% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Ramaxel RMUA5090KB78HAF2133 1x8GB 1,060 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	36.9% Below average	MC Read 14.3 MC Write 12.9 MC Mixed 10.3 36% 12.5 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 10.2 SC Mixed 9.5 27% 9.5 GB/s	Latency 71.2 56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 36.9% Great: 41%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16