Asus MAXIMUS VI EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive126% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VI EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory28.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140815
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 03 '19 at 18:27
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Memory 97.5
1-Core 122
2-Core 240
87% 153 Pts
4-Core 438
8-Core 644
68% 541 Pts
64-Core 643
40% 643 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2540 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.8
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 125
Reflection 134
Parallax 112
102% 124 fps
MRender 118
Gravity 143
Splatting 115
102% 125 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 102%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
153GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 295 386 454 454 459 419 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 442
Write 456
Mixed 392
SusWrite 411
96% 426 MB/s
4K Read 41.4
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 65.9
212% 76.6 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 349
DQ Mixed 363
273% 364 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 126%
Great: 133%
Seagate NAS HDD 4TB-$145
281GB free
Firmware: SC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 107 107 108 110 109 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
63.3% Good
Read 113
Write 108
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 108
73% 99.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 100%
Seagate ST32000542AS 2TB-$100
50GB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 81 83 84 83 85 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 87.3
Write 83.7
Mixed 52
SusWrite 83.4
56% 76.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 61%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
29GB free
Firmware: 50.0AB50
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 110 112 112 112 113 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 112
Write 100
Mixed 84.3
SusWrite 111
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
150% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2009)-$113
4GB free
Firmware: 04.05G04
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 88.5
Write 84.7
Mixed 58.5
58% 77.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.8
166% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 60%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
1TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 127 131 130 131 131 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
66.9% Good
Read 104
Write 82.2
Mixed 68.5
SusWrite 129
71% 96.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 113%
Seagate ST32000542AS 2TB-$100
446GB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 74 75 75 74 75 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Read 100
Write 97.2
Mixed 57.8
SusWrite 74.4
61% 82.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 61%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
0GB free
Firmware: 1AQ10001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 109
Write 138
Mixed 61
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
MC Read 30.7
MC Write 32.4
MC Mixed 26.4
85% 29.8 GB/s
SC Read 21.4
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 27.9
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 48.2
83% 48.2 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VI EXTREME Builds (Compare 426 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VI EXTREME - $580

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $971
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback