Asus MAXIMUS VI EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics98.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive119% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VI EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory24.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140815
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 03 '19 at 15:39
Run Duration351 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Memory 97.1
1-Core 110
2-Core 218
82% 141 Pts
4-Core 386
8-Core 589
60% 487 Pts
64-Core 609
38% 609 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.86
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98.1% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 129
Parallax 101
98% 117 fps
MRender 117
Gravity 138
Splatting 109
98% 121 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
153GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 424 437 203 220 191 189 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 452
Mixed 403
SusWrite 277
91% 406 MB/s
4K Read 43.3
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 63.5
211% 76.2 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 363
272% 363 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 119%
Great: 133%
Seagate NAS HDD 4TB-$145
281GB free
Firmware: SC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 107 108 109 109 109 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
65.6% Good
Read 120
Write 112
Mixed 72.8
SusWrite 108
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 100%
Seagate ST32000542AS 2TB-$100
50GB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 82 83 84 85 84 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
52.6% Above average
Read 100
Write 97
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 83.2
61% 83.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 61%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
29GB free
Firmware: 50.0AB50
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 110 111 112 112 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
61.7% Good
Read 104
Write 103
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 111
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2009)-$113
4GB free
Firmware: 04.05G04
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 89.8
Write 83.5
Mixed 55.8
57% 76.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
177% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 60%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
1TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 129 128 132 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
65.9% Good
Read 102
Write 74.7
Mixed 66
SusWrite 128
68% 92.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 113%
Seagate ST32000542AS 2TB-$100
446GB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 74 73 74 75 75 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
51% Above average
Read 104
Write 94.3
Mixed 56.8
SusWrite 74.1
60% 82.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 51%
Great: 61%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
0GB free
Firmware: 1AQ10001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 95.5
Write 33.8
Mixed 53.8
46% 61 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.7
146% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 72%
ST320005 42AS 2TB
2TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.4 0.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
19.1% Very poor
Read 93.8
Write 93.5
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 0.4
77% 61.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 45%
WDC WD20 EADS-00R6B0 2TB
1TB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 13
9% 13 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 38%
WDC WD20 EARS-00MVWB0 2TB
144GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0 10 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
25.5% Poor
Read 125
Write 123
Mixed 72.3
SusWrite 1.8
100% 80.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
102% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 40%
WDC WD20 EARS-00MVWB0 2TB
417GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 81 83 83 84 82 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
35.6% Below average
Read 80.5
Write 81.3
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 82.1
103% 76.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
92% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 40%
ST320005 42AS 2TB
2TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 81 83 84 84 82 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
40.6% Average
Read 117
Write 106
Mixed 66
SusWrite 82.4
122% 92.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
98% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 45%
WDC WD20 EADS-00R6B0 2TB
2TB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 79 82 82 81 83 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
33.8% Below average
Read 65.5
Write 66.2
Mixed 51.2
SusWrite 81.3
91% 66.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
101% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 35%
ST3000DM 001-9YN166 3TB
0GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 83.3
Write 76.7
Mixed 70.5
97% 76.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
46% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 63%
Hitachi HDS5C3020ALA632 2TB
540GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 79 82 82 81 82 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
42% Average
Read 136
Write 138
Mixed 69
SusWrite 80.5
138% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
81% 1 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 42%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
83.6% Excellent
MC Read 30.7
MC Write 32.4
MC Mixed 26.1
85% 29.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 27
63% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 50
80% 50 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VI EXTREME Builds (Compare 426 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VI EXTREME - $580

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $971
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback