HP p7-1423w

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics49.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP p7-1423w  (all builds)
MotherboardFoxconn 2ADA
Memory9.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 01 '19 at 07:07
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2320-$165
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Memory 88.4
1-Core 83.8
2-Core 146
65% 106 Pts
4-Core 319
8-Core 320
43% 320 Pts
64-Core 319
20% 319 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126
CLim: 1230 MHz, MLim: 1650 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.10.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
49.2% Average
Lighting 61.9
Reflection 63
Parallax 80.2
50% 68.4 fps
MRender 61.8
Gravity 59.1
Splatting 52.4
47% 57.8 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Dogfish 128G 128GB
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0927A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 211 215 217 218 218 MB/s
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53.1% Above average
Read 242
Write 214
Mixed 163
SusWrite 210
46% 207 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 49.9
4K Mixed 16.1
79% 29 MB/s
DQ Read 140
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 91.7
89% 138 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 60%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 8GB
7GB free, PID 005b
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 5.4 4.9 5.4 5 5.4 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
5.27% Terrible
Read 21
Write 1.8
Mixed 5
SusWrite 5
8% 8.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
18% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.27%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
50.5% Above average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 16.1
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 15.5
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 69.2
58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical p7-1423w Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP p7-1423w

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $200
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback