Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics46.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1494
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111110
Uptime3 Days
Run DateSep 25 '19 at 22:01
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$155
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Memory 92
1-Core 98.1
2-Core 172
72% 121 Pts
4-Core 317
8-Core 463
49% 390 Pts
64-Core 459
28% 459 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$141
CLim: 2235 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 436.30
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
46.9% Average
Lighting 60.8
Reflection 57
Parallax 48.8
50% 55.5 fps
MRender 44.5
Gravity 53.7
Splatting 53.2
42% 50.5 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Dogfish 128G 128GB
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0927A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 232 235 240 238 238 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Read 323
Write 223
Mixed 176
SusWrite 234
54% 239 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 48.9
4K Mixed 16.6
82% 29.5 MB/s
DQ Read 126
DQ Write 242
DQ Mixed 94.2
97% 154 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 60%
Seagate ST500DM002-1BD142 160GB
87GB free
Firmware: GJ001Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 72 76 76 77 77 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 70.9
Write 70.5
Mixed 24.3
SusWrite 75.3
44% 60.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
108% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 26% Great: 68%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 64GB
59GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.5 9.4 8.8 12 11 11 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
16% Very poor
Read 30.6
Write 8.8
Mixed 10.8
SusWrite 9.7
17% 15 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 3
211% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 16%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G4M1 Hynix HMT325U6CFR8C-H9 Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 8JTF25664AZ-1G4M1 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
49.2% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 15
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 16.6
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 64.1
62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC Builds (Compare 1,832 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $65
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback