HP EliteBook 840 G1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive90.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP EliteBook 840 G1  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 198F
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180412
Uptime10.7 Days
Run DateOct 30 '19 at 22:23
Run Duration237 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4600U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
58.4% Above average
Memory 78.8
1-Core 96.1
2-Core 167
67% 114 Pts
4-Core 220
8-Core 231
30% 225 Pts
64-Core 232
14% 232 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
HP(103C 198F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
3.29% Terrible
Lighting 3.4
Reflection 5.65
Parallax 5.56
3% 4.87 fps
MRender 6.48
Gravity 2.17
Splatting 6.7
4% 5.11 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.29%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7PD256HCGM-000H7 256GB
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM06H6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 375 404 414 260 186 192 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
Read 438
Write 338
Mixed 260
SusWrite 305
75% 335 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 73.1
4K Mixed 36.7
130% 46.3 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 277
DQ Mixed 164
166% 270 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 108%
WDC WDB NCE5000PNC 500GB
372GB free
Firmware: 7101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 344 353 315 308 305 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 298
Write 308
Mixed 246
SusWrite 328
67% 295 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 37
4K Mixed 28.2
95% 30.4 MB/s
DQ Read 95.7
DQ Write 96.5
DQ Mixed 98
73% 96.7 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 M471B1G73QH0-YK0 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
55.9% Above average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 17.5
56% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 19.9
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 82.9
48% 82.9 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 840 G1 Builds (Compare 328 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 840 G1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 4% - Terrible Total price: $209
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback