Lenovo 20BWS0PJ00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemLenovo 20BWS0PJ00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20BWS0PJ00
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190814
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateOct 30 '19 at 11:59
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 57%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5600U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Memory 73.5
1-Core 62.1
2-Core 147
55% 94.3 Pts
4-Core 251
8-Core 57.3
25% 154 Pts
64-Core 251
16% 251 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Legend(17AA 5036) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4963
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
4.37% Terrible
Lighting 4.5
Reflection 6.5
Parallax 5.87
4% 5.62 fps
MRender 6.95
Gravity 4.37
Splatting 8.96
6% 6.76 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.37%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Dogfish 256GB 250GB
201GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0712B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 327 370 372 403 412 408 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
69.3% Good
Read 379
Write 349
Mixed 296
SusWrite 382
79% 351 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 52.9
4K Mixed 16.3
75% 28.7 MB/s
DQ Read 97.6
DQ Write 285
DQ Mixed 39.2
74% 141 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 69%
HGST Travelstar 7K750 2.5" 500GB-$59
190GB free
Firmware: JF3OA0E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 80 81 81 81 80 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 84.7
Write 75.6
Mixed 47.5
SusWrite 80.2
53% 72 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4B8G1646B-MYK0 Kingston HP16D3LS1KBG/4G 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.8% Average
MC Read 15
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 14
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 12.8
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 93.5
43% 93.5 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20BWS0PJ00 Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20BWS0PJ00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback