Asus P8P67 REV 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics33% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8P67 REV 3.1  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110815
Uptime10.9 Days
Run DateNov 23 '16 at 14:41
Run Duration238 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$136
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Memory 92.4
1-Core 94.4
2-Core 190
74% 125 Pts
4-Core 311
8-Core 504
50% 407 Pts
64-Core 504
31% 504 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360
MSI(1462 2820) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 375.95
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
33% Below average
Lighting 39.7
Reflection 37.1
Parallax 52.1
32% 43 fps
MRender 50.7
Gravity 43.7
Splatting 34.8
34% 43 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 33%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
39.8% Below average
Read 187
Write 104
Mixed 111
30% 134 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 53.5
4K Mixed 10.6
71% 27.8 MB/s
DQ Read 135
DQ Write 107
DQ Mixed 32.3
48% 91.7 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 61%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$70
201GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
57.9% Above average
Read 111
Write 90.9
Mixed 91.6
74% 97.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 1.84
4K Mixed 0.35
89% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 74%
WD Elements 1TB
811GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Read 40.7
Write 39.5
Mixed 24.7
43% 35 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 1.48
4K Mixed 0.18
59% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 43%
ASMT 2105 1TB
786GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
64.7% Good
Read 170
Write 164
Mixed 95.7
176% 143 MB/s
4K Read 1.05
4K Write 1.34
4K Mixed 0.17
55% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 79%
Packard Bell Silver 500GB
26GB free, PID 001e
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Read 30.8
Write 25.7
Mixed 28.2
36% 28.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.27
38% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1333 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
50.4% Above average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 15.7
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 16.4
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 63.4
63% 63.4 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 REV 3.1 Builds (Compare 554 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 REV 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $546
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback