Asrock 990FX Killer

Performance Results


Gaming 55% Gunboat	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 45% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	81.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock 990FX Killer (all builds)
Memory	5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160106
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 28 '19 at 01:23
Run Duration	188 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	40%

Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	67.8% Good	Memory 79.9 1-Core 73.3 2-Core 155 61% 103 Pts	4-Core 301 8-Core 454 47% 378 Pts	64-Core 475 29% 475 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 67.8% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143 318,562 User benchmarks, average bench 76% MSI(1462 3750) CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3013 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 436.48 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	81.4% Excellent	Lighting 104 Reflection 93.8 Parallax 86.4 85% 94.7 fps	MRender 107 Gravity 92.6 Splatting 79.8 75% 93.3 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 81.4% Great: 81%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2018)-$35 23,087 User benchmarks, average bench 233% 222GB free (System drive) Firmware: 101140WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 431 470 500 498 503 463 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 604 Write 575 Mixed 546 SusWrite 477 124% 550 MB/s	4K Read 26.4 4K Write 81.3 4K Mixed 44.2 140% 50.6 MB/s	DQ Read 407 DQ Write 98.8 DQ Mixed 173 148% 226 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 284%
Intel 330 Series 180GB 5,848 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 63GB free Firmware: 300i SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 121 124 126 127 124 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	43.2% Average	Read 350 Write 122 Mixed 144 SusWrite 123 41% 184 MB/s	4K Read 22.9 4K Write 9.7 4K Mixed 13.8 58% 15.5 MB/s	DQ Read 147 DQ Write 52.1 DQ Mixed 69.1 59% 89.5 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 43.2% Great: 83%
WD Black 750GB (2008)-$140 11,698 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 28GB free Firmware: 05.00K05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 83 85 85 84 76 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	56.2% Above average	Read 112 Write 98 Mixed 63.2 SusWrite 82.8 66% 89.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 191% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 56.2% Great: 65%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 751GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 158 160 162 162 161 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	97.3% Outstanding	Read 179 Write 77.3 Mixed 80.2 SusWrite 160 91% 124 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.6 114% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 97.3% Great: 109%
Generic- SD/MMC 16GB 285 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 15GB free, PID 0151 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 17 17 15 15 17 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	8.26% Terrible	Read 17.9 Write 10 Mixed 16.4 SusWrite 15.9 20% 15 MB/s	4K Read 2.8 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.9 58% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 8.26% Great: 15%
WD 4000BEV External 400GB 65 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 139GB free, PID 1010 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 29 29 30 30 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	15.8% Very poor	Read 29.2 Write 29.7 Mixed 22.3 SusWrite 28.7 37% 27.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 83% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15.8% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 F3-12800CL9-2GBRL CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 F3-12800CL9-2GBRL 8GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 800, 800, 800, 800 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	34.4% Below average	MC Read 12.6 MC Write 11.7 MC Mixed 10.8 33% 11.7 GB/s	SC Read 8.4 SC Write 8.9 SC Mixed 9.9 26% 9.07 GB/s	Latency 80.7 50% 80.7 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 34.4% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 990FX Killer Builds (Compare 258 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Killer - $154

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	139x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	29x
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	19x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	22x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	18x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	12x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	9x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	7x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	10x
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples	5x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $490

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16