Asrock 990FX Killer

Performance Results


Gaming 60% Destroyer	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 48% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	81.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	99% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock 990FX Killer (all builds)
Memory	5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160106
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 12 '19 at 00:48
Run Duration	203 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	22%

Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	71.9% Very good	Memory 92.3 1-Core 77.8 2-Core 151 66% 107 Pts	4-Core 280 8-Core 405 43% 342 Pts	64-Core 436 27% 436 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 71.9% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143 318,562 User benchmarks, average bench 76% MSI(1462 3750) CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3013 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 436.48 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	81.8% Excellent	Lighting 104 Reflection 93.8 Parallax 93.2 85% 97.1 fps	MRender 107 Gravity 92.7 Splatting 82.4 76% 94.2 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 81.8% Great: 81%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2018)-$35 23,087 User benchmarks, average bench 233% 228GB free (System drive) Firmware: 101140WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 430 477 499 484 454 415 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	99% Outstanding	Read 619 Write 612 Mixed 591 SusWrite 460 128% 570 MB/s	4K Read 22.7 4K Write 66.8 4K Mixed 33.9 113% 41.1 MB/s	DQ Read 391 DQ Write 98.3 DQ Mixed 171 145% 220 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑ This bench: 99% Great: 284%
Intel 330 Series 180GB 5,848 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 63GB free Firmware: 300i SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 119 124 125 122 112 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	47.4% Average	Read 379 Write 125 Mixed 146 SusWrite 119 42% 192 MB/s	4K Read 25 4K Write 13.1 4K Mixed 17.6 67% 18.6 MB/s	DQ Read 146 DQ Write 50.8 DQ Mixed 65.1 57% 87.4 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 47.4% Great: 83%
WD Black 750GB (2008)-$140 11,698 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 33GB free Firmware: 05.00K05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 73 75 75 75 75 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	52.1% Above average	Read 106 Write 101 Mixed 81.1 SusWrite 74.6 67% 90.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 194% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 52.1% Great: 65%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 751GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 158 162 159 161 160 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	90.6% Outstanding	Read 156 Write 143 Mixed 97.3 SusWrite 160 102% 139 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.1 216% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 90.6% Great: 109%
Generic- SD/MMC 16GB 285 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 15GB free, PID 0151 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	8.43% Terrible	Read 17.7 Write 15 Mixed 13.2 SusWrite 16.8 21% 15.7 MB/s	4K Read 2.8 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 1 61% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 8.43% Great: 15%
Hitachi HTS721010G9SA00 100GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 57GB free, PID 2338 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 40 40 40 40 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	16.9% Very poor	Read 39.4 Write 39 Mixed 25 SusWrite 39.4 48% 35.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.5 46% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 16.9% Great: 17%
WD 4000BEV External 400GB 65 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 139GB free, PID 1010 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 29 29 29 29 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	15.7% Very poor	Read 28.7 Write 27.1 Mixed 22.8 SusWrite 28.6 36% 26.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 83% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15.7% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 F3-12800CL9-2GBRL CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 F3-12800CL9-2GBRL 8GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	49.9% Average	MC Read 19.2 MC Write 15.8 MC Mixed 17.9 50% 17.6 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 8.7 SC Mixed 14.8 33% 11.5 GB/s	Latency 63.5 63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 49.9% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 990FX Killer Builds (Compare 258 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Killer - $154

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	139x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	29x
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	19x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	22x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	18x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	12x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	9x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	7x
A400 240GBKingston $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	10x
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples	5x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $490

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16