Asrock 990FX Killer

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics80.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 990FX Killer  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 25 '19 at 21:00
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
68.9% Good
Memory 90
1-Core 72.7
2-Core 147
63% 103 Pts
4-Core 260
8-Core 430
42% 345 Pts
64-Core 469
29% 469 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3013 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 436.48
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Lighting 102
Reflection 93.3
Parallax 86
83% 93.7 fps
MRender 107
Gravity 92.8
Splatting 83.3
76% 94.3 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2018)-$35
222GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 101140WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 434 496 503 482 495 457 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 601
Write 574
Mixed 563
SusWrite 478
125% 554 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 83.3
4K Mixed 44
136% 50.3 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 99.3
DQ Mixed 169
144% 219 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 107%
Great: 284%
Intel 330 Series 180GB
63GB free
Firmware: 300i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 118 125 125 122 104 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
46.1% Average
Read 345
Write 118
Mixed 154
SusWrite 118
40% 184 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 13.3
4K Mixed 18
68% 18.7 MB/s
DQ Read 147
DQ Write 49.9
DQ Mixed 63.6
56% 86.8 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 83%
WD Black 750GB (2008)-$140
28GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 83 85 85 84 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
56% Above average
Read 107
Write 95.9
Mixed 67.3
SusWrite 87.3
66% 89.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
206% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 56%
Great: 65%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
751GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 158 161 162 162 161 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
Read 165
Write 106
Mixed 105
SusWrite 160
99% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
229% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 109%
Generic- SD/MMC 16GB
15GB free, PID 0151
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
9.14% Terrible
Read 18.9
Write 10.3
Mixed 12.3
SusWrite 17
19% 14.6 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 1.1
71% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 9.14%
Great: 15%
WD 4000BEV External 400GB
139GB free, PID 1010
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 29 29 29 30 29 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Read 27.9
Write 26.4
Mixed 22.7
SusWrite 28.8
36% 26.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
83% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 F3-12800CL9-2GBRL CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 F3-12800CL9-2GBRL 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
48.6% Average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 16.8
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 13.8
32% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 67.2
60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 990FX Killer Builds (Compare 258 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Killer - $154

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $490
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback