Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 127%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 109%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive422% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS IX CODE  (all builds)
Memory27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161228
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 27 '19 at 01:39
Run Duration307 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
Memory 95.7
1-Core 137
2-Core 274
94% 169 Pts
4-Core 503
8-Core 754
78% 629 Pts
64-Core 752
46% 752 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2902 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 440.97
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
131% Outstanding
Lighting 185
Reflection 193
Parallax 192
150% 190 fps
MRender 125
Gravity 182
Splatting 127
117% 145 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 131%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 900P Optane NVMe PCIe 480GB-$900
366GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0325 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1530 1502 1493 1568 1566 1573 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
422% Outstanding
Read 2,147
Write 1,642
Mixed 1,912
SusWrite 1,538
406% 1,810 MB/s
4K Read 197
4K Write 172
4K Mixed 182
622% 183 MB/s
DQ Read 1,170
DQ Write 1,029
DQ Mixed 1,083
817% 1,094 MB/s
Poor: 280%
This bench: 422%
Great: 541%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$89
373GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 461 461 465 473 473 473 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 465
Mixed 424
SusWrite 468
105% 464 MB/s
4K Read 46.6
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 64.8
219% 78.5 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 362
272% 363 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 133%
Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$89
475GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 493 494 494 495 494 494 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
136% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 458
Mixed 425
SusWrite 494
106% 469 MB/s
4K Read 46.6
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 65.9
222% 79.6 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 362
272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 136%
Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$89
359GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 493 494 494 495 494 494 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
136% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 461
Mixed 418
SusWrite 494
106% 470 MB/s
4K Read 47.7
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 66.5
224% 79.7 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 362
272% 363 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 136%
Great: 133%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
201GB free
Firmware: 4B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2014 2020 1977 1951 1947 1942 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
339% Outstanding
Read 2,334
Write 1,956
Mixed 950
SusWrite 1975
404% 1,804 MB/s
4K Read 48.9
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 67.7
233% 84.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,286
DQ Write 1,085
DQ Mixed 1,093
844% 1,155 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 339%
Great: 353%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 38.8
MC Write 40.3
MC Mixed 34.7
108% 37.9 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 45
SC Mixed 32.4
95% 33.3 GB/s
Latency 55
73% 55 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 107%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS IX CODE Builds (Compare 1,303 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE - $279

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $1,128
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback