Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 130%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 110%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive440% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS IX CODE  (all builds)
Memory28 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161228
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 15 '19 at 04:33
Run Duration308 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
97.8% Outstanding
Memory 95.6
1-Core 138
2-Core 274
94% 169 Pts
4-Core 542
8-Core 754
82% 648 Pts
64-Core 748
46% 748 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2902 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 436.30
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
131% Outstanding
Lighting 183
Reflection 192
Parallax 192
149% 189 fps
MRender 126
Gravity 182
Splatting 126
117% 144 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 131%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 900P Optane NVMe PCIe 480GB-$900
376GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0325 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1733 1772 1818 1920 1891 1763 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
440% Outstanding
Read 2,244
Write 1,915
Mixed 2,035
SusWrite 1,816
451% 2,003 MB/s
4K Read 193
4K Write 173
4K Mixed 180
615% 182 MB/s
DQ Read 1,166
DQ Write 1,014
DQ Mixed 1,071
808% 1,084 MB/s
Poor: 280%
This bench: 440%
Great: 541%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$139
374GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 446 444 447 454 455 460 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
132% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 478
Mixed 423
SusWrite 451
104% 462 MB/s
4K Read 46
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 65
219% 78.7 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 361
272% 363 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 132%
Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$139
587GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 493 493 494 494 494 494 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
135% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 458
Mixed 423
SusWrite 493
106% 469 MB/s
4K Read 46
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 65.2
220% 78.9 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 362
272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 135%
Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$139
281GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 493 493 494 494 473 375 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
134% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 473
Mixed 418
SusWrite 470
105% 466 MB/s
4K Read 47.4
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 65.8
222% 79.2 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 362
272% 363 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 134%
Great: 133%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
202GB free
Firmware: 4B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2007 2009 1957 1945 1945 1944 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
340% Outstanding
Read 2,379
Write 1,956
Mixed 962
SusWrite 1,968
406% 1,816 MB/s
4K Read 48.5
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 67.4
232% 84.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,274
DQ Write 1,088
DQ Mixed 1,086
840% 1,149 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 340%
Great: 353%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 38.7
MC Write 40.4
MC Mixed 34.7
108% 37.9 GB/s
SC Read 22.4
SC Write 45
SC Mixed 32.3
95% 33.2 GB/s
Latency 55.2
72% 55.2 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 107%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS IX CODE Builds (Compare 1,297 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE - $279

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $1,177
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback