Samsung 340XAA/350XAA/550XAA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	7.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Samsung 340XAA/350XAA/550XAA (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG NP350XAA-XF3BR
Memory	4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181016
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 25 '19 at 14:44
Run Duration	136 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	21%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8550U 184,356 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	75% Very good	Memory 74.6 1-Core 117 2-Core 241 79% 144 Pts	4-Core 413 8-Core 550 61% 481 Pts	64-Core 531 33% 531 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 75% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Sanyo(144D C804) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.5044 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	7.7% Terrible	Lighting 7.97 Reflection 8.69 Parallax 8.22 6% 8.29 fps	MRender 11.2 Gravity 7.43 Splatting 16.4 10% 11.7 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 7.7% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 871GB free (System drive) Firmware: JU001F SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 100 118 94 101 109 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	67.7% Good	Read 132 Write 142 Mixed 54.5 SusWrite 102 78% 108 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 5.4 4K Mixed 0.6 217% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 67.7% Great: 79%
Kingston DataTraveler 101 G2 USB 2.0 8GB-$6 2,874 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 3GB free, PID 1642 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.9 3.1 3.6 3.7 4 4.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	1.52% Terrible	Read 3.3 Write 0.7 Mixed 1.8 SusWrite 3.5 3% 2.33 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 4% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.52% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown HTH5AN8G6NAFR-UHD 0194 SF464128CKHIWDFSEG 8GB 556 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 2133, 2133 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	61.3% Good	MC Read 24.5 MC Write 21.2 MC Mixed 18.1 61% 21.3 GB/s	SC Read 16.7 SC Write 25.2 SC Mixed 21.8 61% 21.2 GB/s	Latency 91.2 44% 91.2 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 61.3% Great: 66%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 340XAA/350XAA/550XAA Builds (Compare 673 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 340XAA/350XAA/550XAA

CPU
Core i3-7020UIntelBench 40%, 28,454 samples	230x
Core i5-8250UIntelBench 53%, 234,942 samples	192x
Core i7-8550UIntelBench 53%, 184,356 samples	143x

GPU
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	282x
UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)IntelBench 5%, 420,154 samples	274x
MX110NvidiaBench 6%, 6,322 samples	70x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	28x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	26x
WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GBWDCBench 45%, 85,321 samples	22x

RAM
HTH5AN8G6NAFR-UHD 0194 SF464128CKHIWDFSEG 8GBUnknownBench 57%, 556 samples	143x
SMS4TDC3C0K0446SCG 1x4GBUnknownBench 34%, 1,143 samples	82x
SF464128CKHIWDFSEG 1x4GBUnknownBench 35%, 1,004 samples	62x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16