Samsung 340XAA/350XAA/550XAA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics7.06% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemSamsung 340XAA/350XAA/550XAA  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP350XAA-XF3BR
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181016
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 12 '19 at 12:13
Run Duration106 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU5%
CPU Throttled 90%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8550U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Memory 75.4
1-Core 126
2-Core 232
80% 144 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 462
52% 410 Pts
64-Core 458
28% 458 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Sanyo(144D C804) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.5044
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.06% Terrible
Lighting 7.47
Reflection 7.62
Parallax 7.84
6% 7.64 fps
MRender 9.33
Gravity 6.93
Splatting 14.9
9% 10.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.06%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
848GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JU001F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 130 129 133 134 132 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Read 145
Write 138
Mixed 54.7
SusWrite 132
85% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 0.6
193% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HTH5AN8G6NAFR-UHD 0194 SF464128CKHIWDFSEG 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.2% Average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 13.8
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 16.6
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 89.6
45% 89.6 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 340XAA/350XAA/550XAA Builds (Compare 674 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 340XAA/350XAA/550XAA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback