Samsung 340XAA/350XAA/550XAA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemSamsung 340XAA/350XAA/550XAA  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP350XAA-XF3BR
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181016
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 11 '19 at 18:29
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU5%
CPU Throttled 90%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8550U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Memory 83.2
1-Core 123
2-Core 232
82% 146 Pts
4-Core 386
8-Core 387
52% 386 Pts
64-Core 401
25% 401 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Sanyo(144D C804) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.5044
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
3.11% Terrible
Lighting 0.07
Reflection 10.2
Parallax 6.81
0% 5.7 fps
MRender 10.2
Gravity 6.73
Splatting 14.7
9% 10.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.11%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
800GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JU001F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 111 108 106 110 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Read 140
Write 144
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 110
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 0.6
210% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HTH5AN8G6NAFR-UHD 0194 SF464128CKHIWDFSEG 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
60.3% Good
MC Read 24.5
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 17.3
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 21.2
58% 20.3 GB/s
Latency 74.9
53% 74.9 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 340XAA/350XAA/550XAA Builds (Compare 674 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 340XAA/350XAA/550XAA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback