HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive272% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8437
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190522
Uptime3.3 Days
Run DateOct 23 '19 at 17:50
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$262
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
Memory 89.2
1-Core 150
2-Core 298
98% 179 Pts
4-Core 565
8-Core 1,164
101% 864 Pts
64-Core 1,180
73% 1,180 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 105%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
276GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1420 1067 624 618 604 616 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
272% Outstanding
Read 1,755
Write 1,761
Mixed 1,129
SusWrite 825
306% 1,367 MB/s
4K Read 53.8
4K Write 159
4K Mixed 71.4
257% 94.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,743
DQ Write 1,519
DQ Mixed 1,594
1,205% 1,619 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 272%
Great: 340%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 185 184 185 183 184 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 206
Write 176
Mixed 101
SusWrite 183
122% 167 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
241% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 112%
Great: 109%
Hitachi HDS5C3020ALA632 2TB-$270
813GB free
Firmware: ML6OA580
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 91 93 95 91 91 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Read 94.2
Write 104
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 92.1
64% 87.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 73%
WD Elements 107C 3TB
690GB free, PID 107c
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 113 114 114 114 114 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
49.5% Average
Read 121
Write 110
Mixed 85
SusWrite 113
144% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
109% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2666 C16 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
50.7% Above average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 15.7
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 17
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 68.3
59% 68.3 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx Builds (Compare 2,992 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

System: HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $514
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback