ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus 1000HE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	21.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Asus 1000HE (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK 1000HE
Memory	0.8 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1024 x 600 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20091014
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Oct 22 '19 at 18:17
Run Duration	156 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom N280 607 User benchmarks, average bench 20% PBGA 437, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.65 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	18.5% Very poor	Memory 35.6 1-Core 6.8 2-Core 11.8 15% 18.1 Pts	4-Core 10.4 8-Core 10.6 1% 10.5 Pts	64-Core 9.5 1% 9.5 Pts
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 18.5% Great: 32%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40 53,931 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 138GB free (System drive) Firmware: X31200RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 102 98 104 102 104 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	21.6% Poor	Read 113 Write 101 Mixed 95.3 SusWrite 101 23% 103 MB/s	4K Read 10.5 4K Write 12 4K Mixed 7.8 32% 10.1 MB/s	DQ Read 20.3 DQ Write 31.8 DQ Mixed 23 18% 25 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 21.6% Great: 101%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 16GB-$9 10,486 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 9GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 9.4 11 11 11 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	10.7% Very poor	Read 27 Write 11.5 Mixed 14.4 SusWrite 10.7 19% 15.9 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 1.6 106% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.7% Great: 31%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 1 slots used 2GB DIMM SDRAM Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	7.89% Terrible	MC Read 3 MC Write 2.8 MC Mixed 2 7% 2.6 GB/s	SC Read 0.3 SC Write 2.6 SC Mixed 1.5 4% 1.47 GB/s	Latency 224 18% 224 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.89% Great: 26%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback