Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 6.73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	19.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom N280 607 User benchmarks, average bench 20% PBGA 437, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.65 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	6.73% Terrible	Memory 11.7 1-Core 4.8 2-Core 7.4 6% 7.97 Pts	4-Core 11 8-Core 9.6 1% 10.3 Pts	64-Core 11.2 1% 11.2 Pts
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 6.73% Great: 32%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40 53,931 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 138GB free (System drive) Firmware: X31200RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 72 73 85 62 68 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	19.8% Very poor	Read 90.7 Write 88.5 Mixed 90.4 SusWrite 72 19% 85.4 MB/s	4K Read 9.2 4K Write 12.2 4K Mixed 10.7 34% 10.7 MB/s	DQ Read 20.6 DQ Write 29.1 DQ Mixed 22.7 18% 24.1 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 19.8% Great: 101%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 16GB-$9 10,486 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 9GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.6 8.2 9.8 11 9.5 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	9.72% Terrible	Read 23.8 Write 5.6 Mixed 14.8 SusWrite 9.8 16% 13.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 1.5 99% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.72% Great: 31%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 1 slots used 2GB DIMM SDRAM Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	6.85% Terrible	MC Read 2.4 MC Write 2.6 MC Mixed 2.1 7% 2.37 GB/s	SC Read 1.5 SC Write 2.4 SC Mixed 0.8 4% 1.57 GB/s	Latency 388 10% 388 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 6.85% Great: 26%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16