ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus 1000HE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	27.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Asus 1000HE (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK 1000HE
Memory	1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1024 x 600 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20091014
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 21 '19 at 22:53
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom N280 607 User benchmarks, average bench 20% PBGA 437, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.65 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	20.7% Poor	Memory 39.9 1-Core 6.9 2-Core 11.2 16% 19.3 Pts	4-Core 11.2 8-Core 11.5 2% 11.4 Pts	64-Core 11.1 1% 11.1 Pts
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 20.7% Great: 32%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40 53,931 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 139GB free (System drive) Firmware: X31200RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 105 106 104 105 105 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	27.9% Poor	Read 109 Write 108 Mixed 94.2 SusWrite 104 23% 104 MB/s	4K Read 13.6 4K Write 19.8 4K Mixed 15.6 51% 16.3 MB/s	DQ Read 21.3 DQ Write 33 DQ Mixed 25 20% 26.4 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 27.9% Great: 101%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 16GB-$9 10,486 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 9GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 9.9 11 11 11 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	11.6% Very poor	Read 27.2 Write 10.8 Mixed 13.8 SusWrite 10.9 19% 15.7 MB/s	4K Read 2.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 2.1 132% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 11.6% Great: 31%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 1 slots used 2GB DIMM SDRAM Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	7.97% Terrible	MC Read 2.9 MC Write 2.7 MC Mixed 1.9 7% 2.5 GB/s	SC Read 1.3 SC Write 2.6 SC Mixed 1.5 5% 1.8 GB/s	Latency 203 20% 203 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.97% Great: 26%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback