Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 63% Destroyer	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 62% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	76.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	194% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	21.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190425
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Oct 22 '19 at 01:52
Run Duration	266 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	21%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$211 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	75.2% Very good	Memory 78.6 1-Core 110 2-Core 213 75% 134 Pts	4-Core 386 8-Core 678 64% 532 Pts	64-Core 1,152 71% 1,152 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 75.2% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 8599) CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.15 Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	76.4% Very good	Lighting 95.2 Reflection 106 Parallax 86.2 78% 95.9 fps	MRender 86.8 Gravity 91.1 Splatting 92.1 74% 90 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 76.4% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 134GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 875 649 657 637 580 635 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	194% Outstanding	Read 2,392 Write 1,902 Mixed 1,345 SusWrite 672 351% 1,578 MB/s	4K Read 51.6 4K Write 56.8 4K Mixed 53.1 176% 53.8 MB/s	DQ Read 19.4 DQ Write 75.8 DQ Mixed 52.3 39% 49.2 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 194% Great: 340%
Intel 530 Series 480GB-$322 1,386 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 11GB free Firmware: DC32 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 160 149 175 158 153 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	45.1% Average	Read 407 Write 100 Mixed 208 SusWrite 149 48% 216 MB/s	4K Read 23.1 4K Write 12.7 4K Mixed 16.4 63% 17.4 MB/s	DQ Read 10.3 DQ Write 14.2 DQ Mixed 16.5 11% 13.7 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 45.1% Great: 68%
Tcsunbow X3 480GB 2,146 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 92GB free Firmware: Q0526A SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 287 256 256 257 260 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	68.2% Good	Read 297 Write 301 Mixed 255 SusWrite 270 63% 281 MB/s	4K Read 33.9 4K Write 46.1 4K Mixed 37.3 124% 39.1 MB/s	DQ Read 11.7 DQ Write 40.8 DQ Mixed 33.7 24% 28.7 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 68.2% Great: 99%
Hitachi HDS721616PLA380 160GB-$46 8,198 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 109GB free Firmware: P22OABEA SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 66 66 67 66 66 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	39.3% Below average	Read 70.5 Write 64.7 Mixed 43.7 SusWrite 66 45% 61.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 39%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 42GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 145 143 133 149 143 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	93% Outstanding	Read 182 Write 168 Mixed 95.5 SusWrite 142 108% 147 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.2 228% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 93% Great: 109%
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB-$71 21,137 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 58GB free Firmware: PB4OC64G SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 5.2 6.8 12 8.6 7.6 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMV8GX4M1A2133C15 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMV8GX4M1A2133C15 32GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2933, 2933, 2933, 2933 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	89.5% Excellent	MC Read 35.7 MC Write 28.8 MC Mixed 33.2 93% 32.6 GB/s	SC Read 22.5 SC Write 30.6 SC Mixed 26 75% 26.4 GB/s	Latency 83.2 48% 83.2 ns
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 89.5% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,529 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	417x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	215x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)