TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Razer Blade

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics7.18% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive266% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemRazer Blade  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer Razer CH20
Memory8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190108
Uptime12.3 Days
Run DateOct 21 '19 at 18:25
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Memory 89.5
1-Core 110
2-Core 191
76% 130 Pts
4-Core 424
8-Core 618
65% 521 Pts
64-Core 757
47% 757 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑
This bench: 84.1%
 Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1A58 2002) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6294
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.18% Terrible
Lighting 7.47
Reflection 98.5
Parallax 7.44
6% 37.8 fps
MRender 11.4
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 14.7
9% 10.9 fps
Poor: 4% ↑
This bench: 7.18%
 Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CA3-8D512 512GB
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: C490903
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1095 1384 1393 1912 1273 1710 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
266% Outstanding
Read 1,552
Write 27.2
Mixed 92.3
SusWrite 1,461
172% 783 MB/s
4K Read 58.3
4K Write 95.7
4K Mixed 54.4
209% 69.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,215
DQ Write 1,072
DQ Mixed 948
764% 1,078 MB/s
Poor: 98% ↑
This bench: 266%
 Great: 228%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
80.2% Excellent
MC Read 31.8
MC Write 30.2
MC Mixed 22.9
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 31.4
SC Mixed 26.8
72% 25.2 GB/s
Latency 67.8
59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 57% ↑
This bench: 80.2%
 Great: 84%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,038 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples2,070x
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples1,072x
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples469x
GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples1,452x
RTX 2070 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 79%, 10,818 samples599x
GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 43%, 36,643 samples400x
SSD
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples822x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 196%, 44,403 samples287x
CA3-8D512 512GBLiteonBench 168%, 4,424 samples249x
RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples1,765x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 43,895 samples372x
M471A5244BB0-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 72%, 2,214 samples290x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback