Toshiba SATELLITE C670D-11K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemToshiba SATELLITE C670D-11K  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON TKBSB
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110701
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateOct 20 '19 at 17:14
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E-450 APU
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.65 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
24.3% Poor
Memory 43.5
1-Core 15.9
2-Core 30.1
22% 29.8 Pts
4-Core 31.8
8-Core 30.4
4% 31.1 Pts
64-Core 29.3
2% 29.3 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6320
Toshiba(1179 FD7C) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
0.97% Terrible
Lighting 1.17
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.39 fps
MRender 1.38
Gravity 0.73
Splatting 1.48
1% 1.2 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.97%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
238GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 163 143 167 177 172 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27% Poor
Read 114
Write 86.8
Mixed 113
SusWrite 158
27% 118 MB/s
4K Read 8.7
4K Write 12.1
4K Mixed 9.8
32% 10.2 MB/s
DQ Read 76.4
DQ Write 47.1
DQ Mixed 57.7
44% 60.4 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 27%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 RMT3170ME68F9F1600 8GB
1333, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
10.4% Very poor
MC Read 3.9
MC Write 2.6
MC Mixed 3.7
10% 3.4 GB/s
SC Read 2.3
SC Write 1.8
SC Mixed 2.9
7% 2.33 GB/s
Latency 187
21% 187 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SATELLITE C670D-11K Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE C670D-11K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $38
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback