Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 19% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E-350 6,654 User benchmarks, average bench 25% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	20.5% Poor	Memory 35.3 1-Core 18.5 2-Core 35.5 20% 29.8 Pts	4-Core 34.1 8-Core 36.7 5% 35.4 Pts	64-Core 35.1 2% 35.1 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 20.5% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6310 13,166 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sanyo(144D C589) 256MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	0.82% Terrible	Lighting 0.9 Reflection 1.4 Parallax 1.4 1% 1.23 fps	MRender 1.6 Gravity 0.4 Splatting 1.5 1% 1.17 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.82% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung HM321HI 320GB-$40 12,451 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 201GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2AJ10002 SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 53 26 24 61 65 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	28.6% Poor	Read 55.3 Write 61 Mixed 43.9 SusWrite 44 38% 51.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 124% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 RMT3170ME68F9F1600 8GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1333, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	11.2% Very poor	MC Read 4 MC Write 3.6 MC Mixed 3.7 11% 3.77 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 2.7 SC Mixed 3 8% 2.8 GB/s	Latency 225 18% 225 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.2% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 1%

Tree trunk

Desktop 13%

Tree trunk

Workstation 1%

Tree trunk

SSD
N18A 480GBSSDBench 71%, 72 samples	9x
Burst 120GBPatriotBench 66%, 15,567 samples	2x
CS90 0 240GB SSDPNYBench 67%, 400 samples	2x

RAM
M471B5773CHS-CH9 1x2GBSamsungBench 19%, 2,491 samples	13x
M471B5273CH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 13,596 samples	3x
M471B5773CHS-CH9 M471B2873FHS-CH9 3GBSamsungBench 25%, 274 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16