Asus H110M-CS/BR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics30.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus H110M-CS/BR  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181129
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateOct 20 '19 at 14:43
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Memory 90.5
1-Core 112
2-Core 220
80% 141 Pts
4-Core 423
8-Core 423
57% 423 Pts
64-Core 429
27% 429 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 8613) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 436.48
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.4% Below average
Lighting 37.7
Reflection 29.6
Parallax 36.2
31% 34.5 fps
MRender 38.3
Gravity 36.9
Splatting 34.9
30% 36.7 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba HDWD105 960GB
294GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0822A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 364 78 77 4.6 34 76 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 503
Write 402
Mixed 16.5
SusWrite 106
56% 257 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 13.8
4K Mixed 28.2
85% 23.1 MB/s
DQ Read 225
DQ Write 10.3
DQ Mixed 8.6
34% 81.4 MB/s
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32
578GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 169 166 173 173 171 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
Read 163
Write 168
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 169
98% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
145% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSEK.8FBD Kingston KHX2400C15/8G 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
76.2% Very good
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 30.1
MC Mixed 22.8
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 29.2
SC Mixed 24.3
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 66.5
60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-CS/BR Builds (Compare 667 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus H110M-CS/BR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $215
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback