MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive297% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C02
MotherboardMSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02)  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190917
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateOct 19 '19 at 22:02
Run Duration247 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$84
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Memory 70.7
1-Core 140
2-Core 281
87% 164 Pts
4-Core 561
8-Core 838
87% 700 Pts
64-Core 1,050
65% 1,050 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.48
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 123
Reflection 118
Parallax 137
100% 126 fps
MRender 177
Gravity 115
Splatting 104
105% 132 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 102%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
154GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 984 812 815 815 821 811 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
297% Outstanding
Read 2,525
Write 2,363
Mixed 1,815
SusWrite 843
422% 1,887 MB/s
4K Read 65.3
4K Write 166
4K Mixed 90.6
303% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 1,215
DQ Write 1,056
DQ Mixed 1,139
853% 1,137 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 297%
Great: 355%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
233GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 401 274 273 273 272 272 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 299
Mixed 369
SusWrite 294
82% 365 MB/s
4K Read 42.2
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 55.4
190% 67.5 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 232
212% 325 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 114%
Great: 118%
Samsung 830 512GB-$500
468GB free
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 334 323 326 332 340 347 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Read 485
Write 350
Mixed 282
SusWrite 334
81% 363 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 73.2
4K Mixed 27.9
108% 41.1 MB/s
DQ Read 296
DQ Write 103
DQ Mixed 152
125% 184 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 85%
WD Black 500GB (2008)-$95
459GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 50 50 51 51 49 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
39.8% Below average
Read 88.2
Write 87.2
Mixed 69.3
SusWrite 49.9
55% 73.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
186% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
3.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 176 175 177 178 177 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 191
Write 162
Mixed 94.5
SusWrite 176
114% 156 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
222% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 105%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$45
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.4% Good
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 26.5
70% 24.6 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 25
60% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 99.7
40% 99.7 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) Builds (Compare 19,266 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 113% - Outstanding Total price: $539
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback