MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive295% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C02
MotherboardMSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02)  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190917
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 18 '19 at 21:59
Run Duration281 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$85
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Memory 70.2
1-Core 140
2-Core 281
87% 164 Pts
4-Core 533
8-Core 833
84% 683 Pts
64-Core 1,050
65% 1,050 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.48
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 124
Reflection 119
Parallax 126
101% 123 fps
MRender 176
Gravity 115
Splatting 103
104% 131 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 102%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
157GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1075 829 812 815 820 825 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
295% Outstanding
Read 2,465
Write 2,339
Mixed 1,790
SusWrite 863
417% 1,864 MB/s
4K Read 63.7
4K Write 165
4K Mixed 89.6
299% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1,213
DQ Write 1,058
DQ Mixed 1,138
852% 1,136 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 295%
Great: 355%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$72
233GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 274 273 272 272 270 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 477
Mixed 418
SusWrite 294
95% 421 MB/s
4K Read 39.3
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 54.6
184% 65.9 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 234
214% 326 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 112%
Great: 118%
Samsung 830 512GB-$500
468GB free
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 337 344 325 323 331 328 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Read 485
Write 315
Mixed 287
SusWrite 331
79% 354 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 70.6
4K Mixed 28.7
107% 40.4 MB/s
DQ Read 294
DQ Write 109
DQ Mixed 154
127% 186 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 85%
WD Black 500GB (2008)-$95
459GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 50 50 51 49 49 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
39.7% Below average
Read 88
Write 87.7
Mixed 68
SusWrite 49.8
54% 73.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
189% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
3.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 176 177 177 177 176 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 160
Mixed 111
SusWrite 176
116% 158 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
222% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 104%
Great: 101%
TDK LoR TF10 8GB
7GB free, PID 0619
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 4.4 3.5 4.3 4 3.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
1.53% Terrible
Read 1.3
Write 1.3
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 3.9
3% 2.05 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
8% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.53%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$45
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.6% Good
MC Read 29.5
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 26.6
71% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 25.3
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) Builds (Compare 19,366 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 112% - Outstanding Total price: $541
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback