Asus H170 PRO GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 51% Yacht	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 41% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	56.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	97.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H170 PRO GAMING (all builds)
Memory	25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180516
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Oct 17 '19 at 05:36
Run Duration	247 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7400-$70 234,266 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	80.9% Excellent	Memory 88.4 1-Core 109 2-Core 216 79% 138 Pts	4-Core 424 8-Core 425 57% 424 Pts	64-Core 422 26% 422 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 80.9% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% PowerColor(148C 2378) CLim: 1380 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.9.2 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	56.6% Above average	Lighting 71 Reflection 69.3 Parallax 99 58% 79.8 fps	MRender 70.9 Gravity 72.9 Splatting 57.9 54% 67.2 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 56.6% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAK256MAY-1AH12ABHA 256GB 1,792 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 103GB free (System drive) Firmware: M5T4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 314 307 260 272 246 246 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	97.2% Outstanding	Read 393 Write 377 Mixed 292 SusWrite 274 75% 334 MB/s	4K Read 29.6 4K Write 109 4K Mixed 44.7 160% 61 MB/s	DQ Read 375 DQ Write 315 DQ Mixed 233 205% 308 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 97.2% Great: 105%
Hua723020ala640 59Y5483 59Y1807IBMV 2TB 76 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 267GB free Firmware: MK7OA8R0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 88 88 88 88 89 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	48% Average	Read 79 Write 85.3 Mixed 60 SusWrite 87.9 58% 78.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1 178% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 48% Great: 84%
WD WD100EMAZ-00WJTA0 10TB 2,620 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 5.5TB free Firmware: 83.H0A83 SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 39 39 39 40 42 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 60% Great: 113%
Generic- SD/MMC/MS PRO 129GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 120GB free, PID 0153 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	6.34% Terrible	Read 20.2 Write 11 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 12.6 14% 12 MB/s	4K Read 2.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 10% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.34% Great: 16%
WD easystore 25FA 4TB 7,384 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 534GB free, PID 25fa Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 89 90 86 90 90 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	57% Above average	Read 86 Write 55.5 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 88.8 97% 72.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 8.1 4K Mixed 0.7 304% 3.33 MB/s	DQ Read 0.4 DQ Write 7.5 DQ Mixed 0.6 277% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 57% Great: 63%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 128GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 3% 119GB free, PID 007e Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 6 6.2 6.9 6.2 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.98% Terrible	Read 15.8 Write 13.2 Mixed 14.2 SusWrite 6 16% 12.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 6% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.98% Great: 4%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB 34,316 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 29GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 4.7 3.5 4.5 4.6 4.2 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	14.1% Very poor	Read 26.5 Write 8.5 Mixed 5.8 SusWrite 4.3 12% 11.3 MB/s	4K Read 4.4 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 2.6 197% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 14.1% Great: 18%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB 34,316 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 29GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 6.5 4.1 3.6 4.3 4.6 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	13.2% Very poor	Read 26.3 Write 7.2 Mixed 1.8 SusWrite 4.5 10% 9.95 MB/s	4K Read 4.5 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 2.2 173% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 13.2% Great: 18%
General 134GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 125GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 3.4 4.3 3.5 4.3 4.3 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	3.13% Terrible	Read 10.7 Write 0.5 Mixed 4.5 SusWrite 3.9 5% 4.9 MB/s	4K Read 3.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 12% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.13% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G6H1 CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 Hynix HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 32GB 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	83.1% Excellent	MC Read 29.8 MC Write 32.2 MC Mixed 27.2 85% 29.7 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 32.8 SC Mixed 24.2 71% 24.7 GB/s	Latency 69.1 58% 69.1 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H170 PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 2,092 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 61%

Destroyer

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 52%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asus H170 PRO GAMING - $130

CPU
Core i7-6700Intel $170Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	462x
Core i5-6500Intel $60Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	370x
Core i7-6700KIntel $170Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	329x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	233x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	215x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	187x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	137x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	74x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	38x

RAM
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GBHyperX $125Bench 73%, 59,072 samples	125x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 69%, 47,721 samples	91x
HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GBKingstonBench 68%, 49,673 samples	85x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Above average

Total price: $803

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359