Lenovo 90FL

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	25.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	119% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Lenovo 90FL (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 364A
Memory	4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171225
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 11 '19 at 18:45
Run Duration	319 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6400-$79 171,457 User benchmarks, average bench 61% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	77.5% Very good	Memory 88.9 1-Core 99.9 2-Core 197 75% 129 Pts	4-Core 383 8-Core 380 51% 382 Pts	64-Core 395 24% 395 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 77.5% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R9 370X 84 User benchmarks, average bench 26% MSI(1462 3340) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1070 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 16.6 Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	25.8% Poor	Lighting 29.9 Reflection 30 Parallax 31.5 24% 30.5 fps	MRender 30.8 Gravity 31 Splatting 40.5 29% 34.1 fps
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 25.8% Great: 29%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 814GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 396 416 410 443 446 417 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	119% Outstanding	Read 465 Write 428 Mixed 425 SusWrite 421 98% 435 MB/s	4K Read 41.6 4K Write 107 4K Mixed 58.5 195% 69 MB/s	DQ Read 342 DQ Write 288 DQ Mixed 309 233% 313 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 119% Great: 133%
Transcend SSD220 240GB-$35 12,548 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 223GB free Firmware: SBFR71.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 55 51 52 52 50 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	72.6% Very good	Read 435 Write 361 Mixed 298 SusWrite 78.7 65% 293 MB/s	4K Read 30.1 4K Write 85.6 4K Mixed 29.7 129% 48.5 MB/s	DQ Read 234 DQ Write 282 DQ Mixed 159 148% 225 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 72.6% Great: 93%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 922GB free Firmware: CC62 SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 200 189 196 198 186 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	113% Outstanding	Read 203 Write 93.8 Mixed 75.3 SusWrite 193 103% 141 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 154% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 112%
Lacie Rugged THB USB3 2TB 447 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 248GB free Firmware: 1153 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 109 109 107 111 106 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	58.6% Above average	Read 97.2 Write 78.6 Mixed 57.7 SusWrite 107 63% 85.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.7 118% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 58.6% Great: 69%
WD My Passport 071D 500GB 33 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 71GB free, PID 071d Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 42 40 43 43 40 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	21.2% Poor	Read 37.1 Write 36.3 Mixed 24.9 SusWrite 41.2 47% 34.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.8 104% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 21.2% Great: 20%
HitachiG ST 1TB 711 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 142GB free, PID 1014 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 41 41 42 43 41 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	19.1% Very poor	Read 39.6 Write 38.2 Mixed 31.2 SusWrite 41.2 51% 37.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 70% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 19.1% Great: 41%
TOSHIBA MK5055GSX 500GB 73 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 374GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 41 40 42 42 40 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	18.5% Very poor	Read 37.8 Write 37.6 Mixed 25.9 SusWrite 40.8 48% 35.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.5 63% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 18.5% Great: 18%
Generic Storage Device 128GB 60 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 105GB free, PID 1336 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 18 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	18% Very poor	Read 18.2 Write 15.6 Mixed 17.8 SusWrite 18.7 24% 17.6 MB/s	4K Read 7.6 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 3.7 260% 4.8 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Ramaxel RMUA5120MB86H9F2400 2x4GB 358 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	67.1% Good	MC Read 25.5 MC Write 25.9 MC Mixed 20.2 68% 23.9 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 21.4 SC Mixed 19.2 54% 18.9 GB/s	Latency 68.6 58% 68.6 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 67.1% Great: 76%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 90FL Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 75%

Battleship

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 63%

Destroyer

System: Lenovo 90FL

CPU
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $265Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	1x

SSD
MZ7TY128HDHP-000L1 128GBSamsungBench 83%, 2,164 samples	1x

RAM
M378A1K43BB1-CPB 1324 W642GU42J9266N8 24GBSamsungBench 57%, 3 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $445

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16